Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"

shadowfirebird on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 08:21:40 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:21:36 +0000
In-reply-to: <2f4350400612150615g3c35ff69vccc68a6cf2137a76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <2f4350400612150423q4579a48fvd5c7145c14bd80a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7b4a1ba30612150527p51fde03bp5d06806da471253c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612150615g3c35ff69vccc68a6cf2137a76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I've just realised that rule tag conflicts with virtual particles.

Fluxing makes the grab action a bit of a joke, as you can generate as
many points as you like.  Or am I missing the point (sic)?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"
  - From: bd

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"
  - From: Iain Scott
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] It Lives! or, a modern subgame (Draft)
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] It Lives! or, a modern subgame (Draft)
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Amended Proposal "Rule Tag"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread