Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em

Chuck Adams on Fri, 8 Dec 2006 13:19:55 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
From: "Chuck Adams" <cja987@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 12:19:50 -0800
In-reply-to: <B023650F-617C-4892-99E1-BFE33735C772@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200612072201.07506.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612080054g19bba06h9b1be0e9d833221c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6a21ca480612080202h36a717a3j5f3713044f9a5ca1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400612080438p5fb41e61seaea20692ca2b1a5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <B023650F-617C-4892-99E1-BFE33735C772@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I would SO much rather see all actions within a single forum post be
implicitly transactional unless otherwise specified.  If I'm going to
write proposals in pseudocode, I don't want it to be SQL.

chuck
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Proposal: you know you want 'em
  - From: Peter Cooper Jr.
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
  - From: shadowfirebird

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
  - From: shadowfirebird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
  - From: Rachel Kadel-Garcia
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
  - From: shadowfirebird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
  - From: Daniel Lepage

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] AMEND PROPOSAL: The Rules Rule
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: you know you want 'em
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Proposal: you know you want 'em
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread