Re: [s-d] [s-b] The Great Reset of Nweek 112

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake "Peter Cooper Jr.":
> Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Am I correct in thinking that this just passed?
> 
> Yes. We are now in a new Era of B Nomic.
> 
> It is currently nweek 112, nday 1. The clock is ON!
> 
> The current players are me, Wonko, Antonio, and Personman (who just
> rejoined after a *very* brief absence :) Anyone else who wants to play
> should join before trying to do something else in game.
> 
> Rules are up at <http://b.nomic.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page>.
> 
> > I'm still too busy to write props, but I had a few thoughts. Anyone  
> > who agrees, feel free to propose any of these:
> >
> > 1. Why do we need revision numbers on some documents? The wiki  
> > remembers older versions anyway, and the rules page would like nicer  
> > without them.
> 
> Since we've always had them :)
> I don't really know.

If you look back at Berserker Nomic and then A Nomic, you'll see that
I used revision numbers in order to keep histories for rules. Mainly
this was because (1) other, even earlier nomics did this, and (2)
it made the rule/revision combo a unique identifier. I wasn't using
anything so spiffy as a wiki back then, so I had to assign numbers
by hand, and walk uphill in the snow both ways.
 
-- 
J.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss