Re: [s-d] I'm back.

["Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Daniel Lepage wrote:
> On Aug 23, 2005, at 9.35 PM, flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> I'm thinking some method of clock validity is in order.
>> The scripts work when they work, but a method of verification
>> might be in order to preclude advantages. I got screwed by
>> the server down time and am not happy about it (Wonko's
>> apologies for 'inconvenience' not withstanding).
>>
>> Can a daily bounce of the current NDay be implemented easily?
>> Thus, the Wiki and individual Email will preclude argument.
>
> Actually it was very little to do with server downtime. It was a change
> to the way the Clock works, and a corresponding change of the Clock
> page, but without a change to the Clock scripts.

Can't you just have the script parse the rules to figure out what it's
supposed to do this nweek? ;)

> Ndaily clock notifications are certainly easy to do; is it desirable,
> given how many emails it will result in?

I tend to think that it's a little overkill... I think that the occasional
messages are often enough.

-- 
Peter C.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss