Re: [s-d] I'm back.

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Aug 23, 2005, at 9.35 PM, flutesultan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> I'm thinking some method of clock validity is in order.
> The scripts work when they work, but a method of verification
> might be in order to preclude advantages. I got screwed by
> the server down time and am not happy about it (Wonko's
> apologies for 'inconvenience' not withstanding).
>
> Can a daily bounce of the current NDay be implemented easily?
> Thus, the Wiki and individual Email will preclude argument.

Actually it was very little to do with server downtime. It was a change 
to the way the Clock works, and a corresponding change of the Clock 
page, but without a change to the Clock scripts.

Ndaily clock notifications are certainly easy to do; is it desirable, 
given how many emails it will result in?

--
Wonko

"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn 
from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent 
disinclination to do so."
   -- Douglas Adams, _Last Chance To See_

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss