Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] RainbowWolfe submits p102

[Sonnet Nazi <jessicooper@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hmmm. Yes.
 However, I did not see in this section
[[Any player who has declared emself to be Unavailable For The Forseeable 
Future may, by posting a message on a public forum, declare emself to be Not 
Unavailable For The Forseeable Future. By taking any game action on a public 
forum, a player who is Unavailable For The Forseeable Future automatically, 
by implication, declares emself to be Not Unavailable For The Forseeable 
Future (or Not Hiding Under A Rock).]]
any reference as to whether the posting was during the unavailable period. 
Perhaps that should be a bit more explicit? I agree it ought to be implied, 
but there may be rules lawyers in the game who would twist any ambiguity and 
use it for their own evil purposes.

 On 5/23/05, Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> 
> Umm, having re-read the prop is it not implicit in "... When a player
> declares emself to be Unavailable For The Forseeable Future, e must 
> specify
> a period of forseeable time, either in ndays and nweeks or in standard
> days/weeks/months, with a limit of two nyears or one year." that a period 
> of
> time should be set, starting point included (should one wish) with the
> default being from when the message was posted?
> 
> - RW
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss