eugman on Fri, 20 May 2005 16:40:47 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] BvS submits p96


Now why isn't it that this lead to chaos and confusion the first time it was made? So can I slap you with a trout since it isn't prohibited?

Also about the grid is there any way to have lines? The way it currently is it's very hard to have a good idea of distance and perspective ect.


> BvS has submitted a new proposal, p96.
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Proposal 96/0: We Recognize All, Capicse Kiddos?
> A Standard Proposal by BvS
> Last modified on nweek 89, nday 4
> 
> Create a rule in section 1 of the ruleset:
> 
> {{
> == Permissibility of the Indistinguishable ==
> 
> Any action not explicitly prohibited by the rules is permissible and 
> unprohibited.
> 
> Any action indistinguishable from a legal Game Action is a legal Game Action.
> }}
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki.
>  Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be 
> ignored. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss