Re: [s-d] Subgames ideas, ho.

[Raelus <raelusaetherira@xxxxxxxxx>]

eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Players are either Playing Cards or Not Playing Cards, Not Playing by default. After one nweek of a player being Not Playing, a player may become Playing Cards as a game action. Players may become Not Playing Cards as a game action. When a player is Not Playing Cards, all cards in their possession are destroyed.
>
>         You may want to change the terminology since playing cards has two different connotations. Although the rule itself is fine and clear.
>
> Any player Playing Cards may Play with one or more other players Playing Cards as a game action. All related actions in the game are game actions. 
>
>         Technically I think  playing would really be the series of actions one makes to play. Maybe say they start a game or battle or whatever.
>
> Each player begins a Game of Cards with five Power Gems. If e owns more than five Power Gems at any time, Eir Power Gems are destroyed until e has five Power Gems. Power Gems are game objects which only exist in the game they were created by.
>
> If any player at any time controls zero Power Gems in the current game, e is eliminated from the current game. All cards owned by em are removed from the game.
>
> If a player is the only player left in a game, e is the winner of that game. 
>
>       So if we start a battle we have 5 gems and once only one player has any left the battle is over? It sounds like it could be referring to joining the subgame which I doubt is your intention. Whenever referring to the subgame use the word subgame or whatever name you actually give this.  Give the games between players a specific name such as battle so it is clear what you are referring to. The word game or card game is too ambigious .
>
>
>  
>
> > eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I am against  planets. It reminds me of starcraft and my subgame doesn't need 
> > >      
> > any competition.  I will probably be for the card game but it's gong to depend 
> > mostly on the orginiality of the actual game.
> >    
> >
> > >      
> > >
> > > > http://www.bnomic.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/Raelus
> > > > I'd like comments on these two subgame ideas. Too 
> > > > complex/boring/unoriginal? I wrote the planets one when I was bored, but 
> > > > I myself like the idea of the CCG.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > > >   
> > > >
> > > >        
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >      
> > Right. I'll focus on cards then. Any glaring problems with it? I'm about 
> > to add the buying of booster packs and things about sets.
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >    
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
>  
Terminology updated. Thanks.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss