Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] Nweek 87 Proposal Resolution

[Raelus <raelusaetherira@xxxxxxxxx>]

Alex Truelsen wrote:

> On 5/8/05, Peter Cooper Jr. <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
>
> > Proposal 28/2 GNU's Not Unix (BvS):
> > That text doesn't exist in that rule (nor in rule 3-6 anymore, for
> > that matter), so the main part of the proposal doesn't do anything.
> > Only one Genechip will be given out for this proposal's passing, so I
> > don't know if half of it can be awarded to The Voice. Thoughts?
> >    
>
>
> Oh, just that there's more than one Genechip to be paid - the title of the 
> proposal is a recursive acronym. With "GNU" expanding to "GNU's Not Unix," 
> there is a series of acronyms that title expands into, including "GNU," 
> "GNUNU," "GNUNUNU," and so on. Therefore, since 3-6 stated at the time of 
> this proposal's passing that a proposal could be worth multiple Genechips, I 
> would say this one is worth an infinite number of Genechips. The Voice gets 
> half of that infinity. The point of the proposal was of course to fix the 
> hole after profiting from it. So, looks like the hole is fixed and 
> everyone's happy, especially me and Voice.
>
> [[BvS]]
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
>  
" The Title forms an acronym that is a Nomic Word or sequence of Nomic 
Words"
This was the current text of the rule as of Prop Resolution. 
GNUGNUGNU... is a non convergent sequence of Nomic Words, ergo it is 
only worth one genechip.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss