[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] TheVoice submits p42

[eugman@xxxxxxxxxxx]

As it is I will adamantly vote against this. Even if you alter it to cause the negative outcome be that the people who voted no just lose some amplitude instead I might still vote no.  Making  rules get in because they were unanimously agrred as a bad idea is not the way to go.


> TheVoice has submitted a new proposal, p42.
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Proposal 42/0: Let's make things interesting.
> A Standard Proposal by TheVoice
> Last modified on nweek 87, nday 4
> 
> Amend the fifth paragraph of rule 3.3, __Proposing and Voting__ to read as 
> follows:
> 
> {{
> When a Proposal changes from Open to Historical, it is said to have Resolved. At 
> this point, the final votes cast by each player are counted, and if the number 
> of FOR votes exceeds the number of AGAINST votes, or if all votes cast are 
> AGAINST, the Proposal Passes; otherwise, it fails.
> }}
> 
> [[This is basically to encourage use of political parties and hope that it makes 
> the voting a little bit more interesting... perhaps we'll see more bargaining 
> and bribes...]]
> ---------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> This Message was sent automatically by the Wiki.
>  Please do not reply to the sender of this message, as your replies will be 
> ignored. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss