Re: [s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] RainbowWolfe amends p7

[Rainbow Wolfe <rainbowdreamwolf@xxxxxxxxx>]

Then I shall propose such a thing when I work out what framwork it
needs to stand on. And I did consider just re-proping it as a game
document... I'd already started as a rule, and I thought it might be
useful to have at the head of each section. I'll prolly re-prop later.

- RW

On 4/20/05, Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 19, 2005, at 8.35 PM, automailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > RainbowWolfe has amended p7.
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Proposal 7/1: Tidy Rules
> > A Standard Proposal by RainbowWolfe
> > Last modified on nweek 85, nday 6
> >
> > Create rule:
> >
> > {{
> > _Keep BNomic Tidy_
> >
> > For each section Rule 0 is reserved for making notes relevant to that
> > section.
> > There is no Minister for this section and players may update this as
> > they choose to.
> >
> > Rule 0 is a game document and not a rule, with the sole exception of
> > Section 0, 'The Emergency Mechanism'. For the sake of clarity any Rule
> > 0 created for such a log is to be renamed 'Tidy'.
> >
> > [[This can then be used for listing rules amended in other sections
> > that have been changed to account for an item in a single section,
> > this allows for easier future cleaning up. It could also be used for
> > notes to inspire ideas from other players (ideas you have but don't
> > have the time to put together).]]
> > }}
> >
> > Create Rule 0 in section VI.
> > Rename it 'Section VI - Tidy'
> > Add the contents as:
> > {{
> > Hmmm. Maybe a 0s&Xs type thing could be introduced when some sort of
> > scoring system is in place to account for it?
> > }}
> 
> If it's just a Game Document rather than a Rule, why not make it just a
> Game Document? Say that every section of every rulebook has a Game
> Document associated with it called its "Comments" or "Notes" or some
> such thing, and that any player may modify it at any time but it has no
> direct impact on the game.
> 
> Or we could just do this informally - the rules don't forbid us to add
> a little "Comments" box at the end of each section for this sort of
> thing, so we could just set it up without needing to mention it in the
> rules. Although I agree that it might be nice to have it mentioned just
> for completeness.
> 
> As for Tic-Tac-Tiles, I personally will probably not propose any such
> thing. I think one of the problems we had prior to the game reset was
> that some parts of the rules became "owned" by certain players, not
> because those players claimed them in any way but just because they'd
> written enough of it that other players were hesitant to add their own
> material when it might interrupt the 'grand design' of the subgame's
> creator. So I'm sincerely hoping that other players will start propping
> all sorts of interesting game mechanics.
> 
> --
> Wonko
> 
> Stoop and you'll be stepped on; stand tall and you'll be shot at.
>       -Carlos A. Urbizo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss