Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] Peter votes

["Martin R Crowther" <cybersanctuary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry if it wasn't clear. It simply takes the move and loses its own. 
[[notes below]] It just doesn't rhyme as well with notes - but this is what 
was meant.

RW

...
The piece that is, and not the Knight, [[piece is destroyed]]
After taking its movement, yes, that's right! [[takes its movement]]

The Knight now moves as it were other, [[doesn't move as]]
Than the piece that is its brother. [[a Knight]]
It now moves as did the piece, [[it moves]]
That it has recently made to cease. [[as something else]]



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Cooper Jr." <pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 2:04 AM
Subject: [s-d] Re: [auto] Peter votes


> "Martin R Crowther" <cybersanctuary@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > As for the piece - it's an older chess variant. The Knight simply 
> > inherits
> > the moves of the piece it takes, effectively becoming that piece.
>
> Right... But is the inheritance in addition to or instead of the
> Knight's normal move?
>
> --
> Peter C.
> "Every day I walk the fine line between laziness and efficiency."
> -- Jessi
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss