[s-d] Re: [s-b] Rules Updated

[Phil Ulrich <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

p1950 wasn't a haiku. Haikus are 5,7,5. Your prop was 6,7,5.

In the rule "Tomatoes", - line one, 6 syllables, unless you are somehow 
pronouncing "Tomatoes" as "tomtoes" or "The rule" as "thrule", and I'm 
not. In(1) the(1) rule(1) to(1)ma(1)toes(1).
'twixt "Vine" and "during" add this - line two, 7 syllables
{{ at a cost of 5 }} - line three, 5 syllables.

Cards are me, and I need you to email me again, because it may just be 
me, but the current card scripts don't make any sense. i.e. I don't 
know what most of them do.

P-Specs will go into the Book of Piece sometime this weekend, I just 
don't have time now.

--Phil
=======================================
"Can anything be stupider than that a man has the right to kill me 
because he lives on the other side of a river and his ruler has a 
quarrel with mine, though I have not quarreled with him?" - Blaise 
Pascal


On Dec 3, 2004, at 1:22 PM, Daniel Lepage wrote:

> The Rules are now up to date. A few other Ministries don't seem to be, 
> though:
> Everyone was dealt a card at the beginning of the nweek.
> Proposals 1946, 1949, and 1951 all passed, and all created/revised 
> P-Specs.
> Proposal 1948 reset all scores (since Rodney was believed to have over 
> one thousand points), so current scores should be zero plus all 
> proposal bonuses (bonuses are awarded after the props are implemented, 
> I believe). Plus, I got 5 bonus points from p1950, since it was a 
> Haiku.
>
> I'm not sure who's responsible for recognizing each of the above, but 
> I don't think any of them are me.
>
> Oh, and I water my vine for 5~, and pick the tomato off my Vine.
>
> --
> Wonko
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss