Norinel on Sun, 24 Oct 2004 14:22:07 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] Norinel votes


I was in a very negative mood today.

On Sunday, October 24, 2004, at 03:12 PM, wonko@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Norinel's votes:
Proposal 1917/0: Get off the couch!                          :   Shelve

Not the intent of the tech descriptions as far as I can tell; a better fix would be to change it in the technologies rule to something like "may attempt once every nweek to"

Proposal 1918/0: Home is where you hang your hat             :   Shelve

Too vague about the definition of "under"; having multiple pieces in one space (If that's what the under bit means) makes display annoying.

Proposal 1919/1: Down to Brass Tax                           :   Shelve

Rule is far too unclear. Better to deal with them on a case by case basis, or just destroy Societies in general.

Proposal 1920/1: Piece on Nomic                              :   No

What Wonko said; it seems a little too powerful for now.

Proposal 1921/0: Sauce                                       :   Shelve

Could be performed infinitely, no provisions to record it.

Proposal 1922/0: Making tomatoes finite                      :   Yes
Proposal 1923/0: The Drunk                                   :   No

Strange rule, too many new pieces this nweek, doesn't do anything directly.

Proposal 1924/0: Pay for your piece                          :   Shelve

Doesn't handle any new p-specs created this week. What's a tile?

Proposal 1925/0: untitled                                    :   Shelve

Some objects aren't supposed to be transferred. (Cards, for instance)

Proposal 1926/1: Conditional Triggers                        :   No

Can. Of. Worms.

-Norinel

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss