Jeremy Cook on Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:33:54 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[s-d] Re: [s-b] [auto] PlayerIain submits p1917/0


On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 08:38:37AM -0500, wonko@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Amend Rule 1639/5 [[Political Go]] Section C to add 
> "4. Mining. 
> 5. Theft." 
> to the list of types of move. 
> [[I should have notcied this when 1854 was proposed (in fact I think I did, 
> but then I forgot about it...), but given the other two technologies 
> specifically mention they dont take up a P-Go move, these two _should_.]]

No, they weren't intended to take up a move. The reason those two
technologies don't specifically mention that is that there's no
ambiguity there, whereas playing a stone and forming an alliance are
listed in the pGO rule as taking a move.

Zarpint
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss