Re: [spoon-discuss] A Consensus is Reached

[glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On 2 Aug 2004 at 1:27, Jeremy Cook wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 09:46:48PM -0400, Daniel Lepage wrote:
> > Ok, Straw Poll Results
> > 
> > The options were:
> > 	1) Keep the long tags
> > 	2) Use the short tags
> > 	3) Put in new headers
> > 	4) Don't add anything
> > 
> > The votes were:
> > 
> > Wonko: 		3,2,4,1
> > Phil: 		4,3,2,1
> > bd: 			4,3,2,1
> > SkArcher:		1,2,3,4
> > Teucer: 		2,1,3,4
> > Sagitta: 		4/2
> > Glotmorf:		2,4,3,1
> > Iain: 		2,1,4,3
> > Zarpint: 		4,3,2,1
> > 
> > Now the question is, what's the best method for tallying votes when 
> > various voters used different schemes?
> > 
> > Plurality winner: tie, 4 vs. 2
> > IRV winner: 2
> > Condorcet Winner: 2
> > Borda winner: 2
> > Approval winner: 2 (assuming each player approves of their first two 
> > picks)
> > 
> > I believe 2 is the winner, and thus the subjects should have [s-d] and 
> > [s-b] inserted instead of [spoon-business] and [spoon-discuss]
> 
> Can we get ellipsis to stop making the header "[s-d] Re: [s-b] foobar"?
> As Phil noted, it would be nice if s-b had a Reply-To header for s-b
> and not s-d.

Phil only asked why it didn't.  Personally I prefer it the way it is.

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss