Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Emergency?

[Araltaln <smgafkjen@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 01:01:10AM -0500, Araltaln wrote:
>
> > Mark Karasek wrote:
> >
> > > Nevertheless, I come Off Leave (thus leaving the Vat) and recognize an SOE.
> >
> > That would appear to bring our total of players recognizing a State of 
> > Emergency to 9, and, with 17 players, we would seem to have a genuine 
> > Emergency on our hands.
> >
> > I propose that spoon-business be the Forum, if I need to, and note with 
> > amusement that the Procedure breaks without an Administrator too.
>
>
> Any of us can be the Emergency Admin.
>
> Zarpint

Any of us can be the Emergency Co-Ordinator--the Administrator, as far 
as I can tell, is still the Administrator, and rule 0 tells each of them 
to do various things (including, importantly, telling the Administrator 
to implement the chosen refresh proposal). This isn't to say a 
sufficiently clever refresh proposal couldn't fix that easily enough 
("The Emergency Co-Ordinator shall be required to implement the 
following:"), though.

--Araltaln, still amused, regardless of whether he's right or wrong
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss