SkArcher on Fri, 2 Jul 2004 04:56:56 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: CFI assignments


On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 02:05:18 -0500, Araltaln <smgafkjen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

SkArcher wrote:

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:39:19 -0400 (EDT), Zarpint <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Araltaln wrote:

First, I'm going to name the Administrator as the defendant for my
currently-unnumbered CFI (I'll refer to it as -1, for argument's sake,
but it needs a real number); Zarpint, I believe, currently has the
highest score and thus gets to randomly assign a Judge.



I'll name the Administrator the defendant for -2 as well, giving Zarpint
more to do.


I'm honored that you quoted me. With a roll of my dice, I randomly assign
-1 to Teucer and -2 to SkArcher.


I point out that I am still officially Hiding under a Rock/On Leave as of the message from Zarpint. This doesn't change anything, since Rule 127 doesn't prevent players who are hiding under a rock/On leave from gaining CFIs, it only specifies what happens when they become On leave while having a pending CFI

Someone should probably patch that hole.

There's no hole, come to think of it; Rule 205/7 (Leaves of Absence) states "A player who is On Leave cannot be selected by any process which randomly selects a player," so Zarpint can't have randomly selected SkArcher.

So it does. Good. Now Zarpint can select again, although this time I am an eligible candidate.

--
 SkArcher
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss