[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Nweek 55 BALLOT (finally!)

[Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 5, 2004, at 10:17 AM, Zarpint Jeremy Cook wrote:


> > Proposal 1733/0: No thanks, I'm full (Wonko)
>
> No. I like Eclairs.

I personally feel that this rule does not add anything useful to the 
game, and is too vague about what it means to be 'defined' by the 
rules; there are a number of objects which could be construed to be 
'defined' by the way they're mentioned in the rules, or they could be 
construed not to. Given that, it seems pointless to keep them around 
when all we ever do is argue about them, and when they could be 
inadvertently denying the existence of some objects that are only 
vaguely 'defined'.

> > Proposal 1734/1: It Spreads... (Wonko)
>
> Yes. We now need Plague Rats.

How would people feel about a 'play field' - cards would be either in 
the Deck, in people's hands, or 'On the Field'. Then cards like Syn 
would be put on the field instead of declaring that they don't get put 
anywhere for a while; then also, permanent cards could be created.

Thoughts?

--
Wonko
Award Wonko a Win.
-----[[BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK]}-----
Version: 3.1
GU/O d-(++)(?) s+:+ a--->+++ C++>++++>$ UB+>++++ P--@ L+>+++ E>++ 
W++(+++) N+{((++]]}}) o?>++++ K? w------- O? M++ V- PS@ PE-@ Y-- PGP- 
t+ 5 X R+ tv--@ b+++@ DI++++ D G++ e*>++++ !h r++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss