| Daniel Lepage on 7 Aug 2003 00:19:28 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Oops |
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 08:05 PM, Glotmorf wrote:
Then again, is r1637 supposed to represent some steady state, so that the world's rules are wiped in perpetuity? If so, doesn't that prevent there being a C Nomic too? :)
I think it's supposed to represent some steady state, but it doesn't define one, so it doesn't represent a steady state. I could see good arguments for either 'the action happens when the rule takes effect' or "the rule has no effect because it's not worded as a rule".
-- Wonko _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss