RE: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] When is a thing not a thing? When nothing says it's a thing.

["Craig" <ragnarok@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>{{ __What was that again?__
>>
>>{{ __Undefined Actions and Objects__
>>
>>If an action is referenced in the rules, but there is
>>no statement in the rules defining that action, that
>>action cannot be performed.
>>
>>If an object is referenced in the rules, but there is
>>no statement in the rules defining that object, that
>>object is equivalent to a Chocolate Eclair.  A
>>Chocolate Eclair is an object that can be eaten or
>>smeared.
>>
>>}}
>>
>>}}
>>
>-It makes my head hurt... "eat" and "smear" are not defined. So you get an
Eclair that you can't do anything with? Can't even own it, as it >happens...
could be worse, though. Take out that last sentence and we've got us an
infinite loop. That might be fun, too.-

What if we declare that any action that is not defined is equivalent to
Smearing a Jelly Donut?

 -- Teucer

"Best case scenario: free ice cream for all. Worst case scenario: World War
3-27"
 -carbon

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss