Re: [spoon-discuss] Subgame?

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sunday, June 29, 2003, at 05:40  AM, Iain Scott wrote:

> Rob Speer:
> > Next nweek - after we're done nuking the Grid and stuff like that - 
> > I'm
> > going to propose Political Go.
>
> That looks like fun... though I wouldnt bother with A-nomics stuff 
> about buying and selling stones, etc..
>
> > (On a 13x13 board, not a 19x19 one, thus
> > fixing the big problem that it had on A Nomic.)
>
> Or perhaps evan smaller? while a, say, 9x9 board is less intresting, 
> it would be significantly quicker, which I suspect is important for 
> the enjoyment factor when played via B-nomic...
>
>
> > The "turn order" in that
> > game was simple enough - you get to make one move in each span of time
> > equivalent to the proposed "checkpoints". Within that time, if you 
> > move
> > first, you, well, move first. A little bonus for people who are paying
> > attention.
>
> Though there would have to be some form of resulution when two 
> conflicting moves (say puting a stone down in the same spot) where 
> made at approximately the same time...

On the Grid (when moves took effect at the end of the nweek) this was 
done simply by canceling illegal moves. If I try to put a stone down 
where you just put one, whichever hits the forum first wins, and the 
other placer's move fails.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss