Re: [spoon-discuss] Keywords

[Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday, May 26, 2003, at 06:13  PM, Glotmorf wrote:

> On 5/26/03 at 6:04 PM Daniel Lepage wrote:
>
> > Say, looking at the ruleset, I notice that most of the rules seem to 
> > be
> > uncategorized in terms of keywords. Also, there are some seemingly
> > random inconsistencies... like that 17 rules have the keyword "gnome";
> > but for some reason there's one other with kw "gnomes".
> >
> > It also occurred to me that it might be helpful to assign each rule a
> > 'primary keyword'; thus, by looking at the entire ruleset sorted by
> > primary keyword would show each rule exactly once, sorted by what
> > they're most relevant to.
> >
> > Any thoughts about any of this?
>
> I think we may be looking at a Keyword Minister...:)

I'd be willing to do that. In two weeks, at least, once I've got some 
free time.

I don't know how easy it would be for Dave to permit somebody to change 
the keywords field of the database without giving them access to 
anything else (my SQL skills are rudimentary at best, so I have no idea 
how all the GRANT stuff works); on the other hand, I imagine it 
wouldn't be too hard for em to write a script that takes, say, a list 
of rnumber:(keywords) pairs and assigns them to the rules, and I could 
easily generate a list like that.

--
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss