Re: [spoon-discuss] Um, why?

[SkArcher <SkArcher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

23/05/2003 02:11:18, "Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 5/23/03 at 12:46 AM SkArcher wrote:
>
>>23/05/2003 00:24:11, bd <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You used your ring. You can't unilaterally block it anymore ;)
>>
>>I don't loose the ring just because i've used it
>>
>>The reason I blocked it was because It WON'T become a public source of
>>cans of whoopass - Whoever
>>gets to it first (bearing in mind we would all be in Limbo) would be able
>>to buy it and then they
>>would have teh monopoly.
>>
>>I think that maybe the players should go out and build them where they
>>want 'em, not make it a race
>>to see who posts first
>
>The entity has a point.  Which reminds me, the telephone needs disconnecting.
>
>						Glotmorf
>

True, another thing that depends in total on luck, or staying up waiting for the post

therefore I make the following proposal

{{__No Cold Calling__

Repeal rule 944 (The Telephone) }}




SkArcher

But really, World Domination is only a hobby of mine
 - Jordan Kennedy, www.exploitationnow.com


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss