Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Prop: no bad props

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/26/02 at 9:42 PM Wonko wrote:

>Quoth Glotmorf,
>
>> {{ _So...Why Was This Never Done Before?_
>>
>> {{ _Impermissibility of the Prohibited_
>>
>> If, by the current rules, a Proposal is illegal, or
>> contains an action which is illegal, it shall not be
>> added to the ballot.
>>
>> [[ So if it gets added onto the ballot, and it turns
>> out what it does is illegal, it gets retro-undone,
>> since it shouldn't have been on the ballot in the
>> first place. ]]
>>
>> }}
>>
>> }}
>
>Wouldn't it make more sense to stick this in the proposal rule? Like, right
>after the part where proposals normally get added?

Probably.  I sent this from the office; I'll rewrite it as a change to the proposal rule (or the ballot rule?) before the next ballot.

						Glotmorf

-----
The Ivory Mini-Tower: a cyber-anthropologist's blog
http://ix1.1sound.com/ivoryminitower

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss