Glotmorf on 3 Dec 2002 04:05:02 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] The Daily Recognizer (Sunday evening)


On 12/2/02 at 8:40 PM Wonko wrote:

>Quoth David E. Smith,
>
>> CFIs:
>> Glotmorf's "p1234 is illegal" CFI is 1242, assigned to Capsaicin.
>> Glotmorf's "p1237 is illegal" CFI is 1243, assigned to Wonko.
>
>Uh... TRUE... Trivially, obviously TRUE. Of course implementing a proposal
>that's explicitly forbidden is illegal. So is implementing a failed
>proposal. Why wouldn't it be?

The big question is, if implementing it is illegal, why is it even proposable?

>> Under the (old) Garbage Collection rule, Squire of Dimness is removed
>from
>> the Roster.
>
>Actually, e isn't. A side effect I've noticed of my Proxy rewrite:
>"When this happens, the player whose proxy is held is considered to have
>cast the vote, instead of the proxy-holder."

Yes, but if Squire of Dimness is on Forced Leave, doesn't that mean e has to explicitly say e's no longer On Leave before x number of nweeks pass with em on Forced Leave?

						Glotmorf

-----
The Ivory Mini-Tower: a cyber-anthropologist's blog
http://ix1.1sound.com/ivoryminitower

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss