Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Change to Glotmorf Rules!

[Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Glotmorf,

> On 11/21/02 at 5:36 PM Wonko wrote:
> 
>> Quoth bd,
>> 
>>> What?
>> 
>> Rule two says, and I quote:
>> "Any similarity between the string of characters that constitute the name
>> of a Player and a string of characters in the text of a Proposal, Rule, or
>> Judgment shall have no impact on the implementation of that Proposal, Rule,
>> or Judgment, unless the language of the Proposal, Rule, or Judgment
>> specifically indicates the string of characters is referring to a Player of
>> that name. [[For example, "the player JohnDoe" or "the player named
>> JohnDoe."]]"
>> 
>> So the fact that a rule contains the string 'Glotmorf' doesn't mean it's
>> referring to the player called Glotmorf unless it specifically says "the
>> player Glotmorf". Likewise, the fact that a CFI contains the string
>> 'Glotmorf' doesn't mean it pertains to the player known as Glotmorf unless
>> it specifies that it does.
>> 
>> So nice try, but no. All you've done is create a rule that's really hard to
>> repeal.
> 
> And one that takes priority over Rule 2, thanks to rule number order.

What does priority have to do with anything? There's no conflict between
them.

-- 
Wonko

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss