Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] NWEEK 24 BALLOT

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/12/02 at 10:52 PM Orc In A Spacesuit wrote:

>Proposal 1066/0: To Curse Once More (Wonko)
>Orc: YES (5) Voice: YES (1)
>
>Proposal 1067/0: Let Me Make One Thing Perfectly Clear... (Glotmorf)
>Orc: NO  Voice: YES

Please note that if 1067 passes, 1066 is unnecessary.

>Proposal 1096/0: But This Is Less than I Started With! (Glotmorf)
>Orc: NO  Voice: YES  [[Right now, you can't convert BNS to points.  I like
>that]]

Yes, but right now you can convert BNS into raw materials.  I don't like that.

BTW, please note that this is an a la carte prop; are you voting no on both part 1 and part 2?

>Proposal 1097/0: Cleanup on Aisle 1073! (Glotmorf)
>Orc: NO  Voice: YES  [[I don't care]]

If you don't care, why not abstain?

>Proposal 1104/0: Restacking Bonus Boxes (M-Tek)
>Orc: NO  Voice: NO  [[you took out the definition of found]]

Did not.  That's in subsection A; this prop only replaces subsection B.

>Proposal 1108/0: Patch BNomic-1.0.0-to-1.0.1.diff (bd)
>Orc: NO  Voice: YES [[make bonus boxes MO's]]

Excuse me?  Bonus Boxes *are* MOs.

>Proposal 1127/0: IT (bd)
>Orc: YES (15)  Voice: NO (1)

Um, guy?  It's not a prose prop, as far as I can tell.  Even if it was, The Voice wouldn't be giving it a rating if e was voting against it.

>Proposal 1130/0: Okay, the World Revolves Around You This Nweek (Glotmorf)
>Orc: NO  Voice: NO [[I think I see where you are going, but it lacks
>control.]]

Lacks what control?  What would see more tightly controlled?

>Proposal 1131/0: Let's Get the Ball Rolling... (Glotmorf)
>Orc: NO  Voice: NO [[I have a better way of doing this... but go ahead]]

How does "but go ahead" translate into two No votes? :)

Remind me to buy some stock in The Voice some time...

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss