Baron von Skippy on 20 Jul 2002 01:33:04 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Alterations (wow, that was fast...)


> > > -Okay, I've got it now, but this is gonna cause a discrepancy with Rule
> >10,
> > > but I think it'll be okay because, even though Rule 10 claims to take
> > > precedence, this proposal will have a higher Chutzpah... yeah, it'll
> >work
> > > fine, according to the bulleted list in Rule 33. Good. Fine. Whatever.
> >I'm
> > > sure you'll find a way out of this one...-
> > >
> > >                                                    -BvS-
> >
> >Even with a higher Chutzpah, you'll need a 2/3 majority to pass your
> >proposal, according to Rule 10...
> >
> >Athena
>
> -Ah, but I don't, because I'm not attempting to modify Rule 10, I'm
> attempting to declare it null as applies to IRs. And I'm not breaking any
> other parts of Rule 10, either. Muahaha.-
>
>                                                    -BvS-

Rule 33: Chutzpah defers to statements in the rule saying a rule defers to
other rules.

Rule 10 says that it takes precedence over all other rules, so in order to
let the fight between your rule and r10 be decided by Chutzpah rather than
that statement, you need an explicit statement saying in your rule saying
it takes precedence over Rule 10, and you need a higher Chutzpah.

Athena

-I'd have to hear a second opinion on this one, since neither rule defers to the other, Rule 10 declares precedence, and there's nothing there about Chutzpah taking a back seat to precedence, and my prop already has a higher Chutzpah (13 to 10).-

                                                  -BvS-


_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss