| Joel Uckelman on 24 Jun 2002 02:13:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] DimShip redo |
Thus spake bd: > On Sunday 23 June 2002 9:55 pm, Joel Uckelman wrote: > > We might mean "A and not B", but it seems to be more at "A, and if A th= > en=20 > > not B". That's logically equivalent to "A and B", though, which indicat= > es=20 > > that "lest" cannot be given a purely syntactic characterization. > > Umm... A =3D> not B logically precludes A and B. Oops. Typo. I meant "A and not B". Sheesh, and I'm the one who's the logician. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss