bd on 22 Jun 2002 02:45:05 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision)


On Friday 21 June 2002 10:41 pm, bd wrote:
> On Friday 21 June 2002 10:19 pm, Alex Truelsen wrote:
> > >-But if it didn't pass, it didn't pass. And if it did pass, it ddn't
> > > pass.
> > >
> >  > There's no paradox, only one possible outcome. However, if any
> >  > proposal read that, I'd vote against it. Players shouldn't get points
> >  > for
> >
> > nothing.-
> >
> > Please fix your quoting. My reader cut off everything after Wonko's .sig
> > seperator, including your response. Please, please use the >'s, like
> > sensible
> > people.
> >
> > And now for the response.
> >
> > Actually, he'd lose points. It unpasses itself, right?
> >
> > -Is this directed at me, or at everyone? If at me, I quote Aslan the
> > Great when, on his way out, he said unto you, "Even without your pants
> > down, everyone can see what an ass you are." There's nothing wrong with
> > my quoting- I cut what I don't want and don't screw with the rest. Maybe
> > your reader needs fixing. You want me to insert >s into my message? "Like
> > normal people?" If that was directed at everyone, then my message stands,
> > but it's on behalf of everyone who agrees with me.-
>
> My reader follows RFC (something) and cuts off everything after "\n-- \n",
> the standarg .sig seperator. Your quoting method ruins that method. I'd
> appreciate it if you'd fix it.

Oh, and you don't need to use '>'s, you just need to munge the sig seperators, 
so your response dosen't get cut. And our current method is hard to see 
sometimes.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss