Re: [spoon-discuss] Re: [Spoon-business] Mega-Proposal (revision)

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 6/20/02 at 1:36 AM Dan Waldron wrote:

>On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Wonko wrote:
>
>> > Beings may make changes to the rules and game state.  Non-beings may
>not,
>> > except as specified by physical law.
>> > }}
>>
>> So a non-being object such as, say, a mutable rule couldn't change the
>game
>> state?
>
>This is true.  Mutable rules cannot directly change the game state.
>
>Mutable rules can ask the Administrator to change the gamestate via rule
>25.
>
>I know this seems weird, but if you think about it, it makes sense.  Just
>because someone passes a law declaring that the grass is greener on the
>other side it doesn't mean that the colour will change until someone
>actually goes out there with a paintbrush.

Um.  Isn't there something in the current body of rules that says the gamestate is affected when an action is taken, rather than when the Administrator recognizes it?

						Glotmorf


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss