Re: spoon-discuss: Proposed r0 proposal

["Glotmorf" <glotmorf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/31/02 at 1:09 AM Jonathan David Amery wrote:

>Lets get a head start here - anyone disagree with something like
>this?:
>
>{{
> All normal gameplay ceases.
>
> Players are anyone who was a player during nweek 16, plus the
>Administrator.
>
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx is a public forum.
>
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx is not a public forum.
>
> Constitutional changes may be proposed on any public forum by any
>player, and may change anything.
>
> Any constitutional change that is objected to by two players less
>than 72 hours after it was proposed is defeated, and is removed from
>consideration and ceases to exist.
>
> Any constitutional change that has not been objected to by two
>players is put into affect 72 hours after it was proposed.
>
> If at any point no constitutional change has been accepted within the
>last three days, and it is at least 5 days after the process started,
>then normal gameplay resumes at the beginning of nweek 18.
>}}

That's scary. :)  I see the forum being flooded with proposed changes on the off-chance that no one would object to them.

I also see Mr. A taking up Kentucky bourbon as a hobby. :)

But these are caveats.  Not necessarily objections...

						Glotmorf