spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: CFJ 690/0

[Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth bd,

> On Wednesday 22 May 2002 18:27, you wrote:
> <snip>
>> As Glotmorf has repeatedly insisted, Charter Props are not normal Props.
>> Because the Charter Rule says so, Charter Props are put on the Ballot and
>> voted on. However, the Charter Rule does not account for the following
>> things which they are excluded from by not being proposals:
>> They don't recieve Serial Numbers (r5)
>> They may attempt to temporarily circumvent the rules (r10)
>> They may not be revised (r19)
>> **They are not processed, nor do their actions take effect**, nor may they
>> be vetoed, nor do they cause dimension changes to their proponents (r32)
>> They need not be displayed for public review (r211)
>> They may not be rectified by the admin to change 'day' to 'nday' (r257)
>> They are not exempt from the Scarf's effects (r258)
>> They may not modify the LOGAS (r260)
> 
> Additional analysis:
> I quote rule 631/1:
> 
> Groups, as defined in Rule Five-Seven-Eight, also known as Clubs, can be
> formed by a Player making a Charter Prop, which is like a normal prop. in
> that it's added to the nweek ballot and voted on. A Charter Prop, though,
> passes unless 2/3 of the votes it receives are against it.
> 
> It goes on to put more restrictions, but it does not say that the charter prop
> is different in that it has no effect.

So you believe that Charter Props *are* proposals?

-- 
Wonko