Glotmorf on 10 May 2002 01:15:52 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: cfj 666


On 5/9/02 at 8:29 PM Wonko wrote:

>Quoth Naath Thabana,
>
>> Statement: The game has never had an object numbered
>> 655.
>>
>> Analysis:
>>
>> The Reality Police had the sushi.
>>
>> The Reality Police's message implies that he sushified
>> the text:
>>
>>
><CFJ><statement<ItcannotbedeterminedwhetherthisstatementappearswithinalegalC
>FJ> .
>>
></statement><defendant>BaronvonSkippy</defendant><analysis>Ihavethesushi.IfIra
>> nth
>>
>isthroughbabelfishasonebigwordandaddedthewhitespaceafterwards,it'slegal.IfIdid
>> n'
>> t,it'snot.I'mnottelling.</analysis></CFJ>uin.
>>
>> then added whitespace and linebreaks.
>>
>> However sushifying it via Korean produces the text:
>> Inside a Korean
>>
>> sushifying it via French and German produces the text:
>>
>>
>ItcannotbedeterminedwhetherthisstatementappearswithinalegalCFJ.BaronvonSkippyI
>> ha
>>
>vethesushi.IfIranthisthroughbabelfishasonebigwordandaddedthewhitespaceafterwar
>> ds
>> , it' slegal. IfIdidn' T, it' snot.I' mnottelling.uin.
>>
>>
>> Neither of these two can be turned into the message
>> sent by adding only whitespace and linebreaks,
>> therefore he failed to operate sushification correctly
>> and so the CFJ #655 never existed.
>>
>> Judgement
>> dunno
>>
>> why?
>>
>> because I said so!
>> I accept that the object labeled CFJ 655 is/was not a
>> CFJ, since it wasn't a legal post (on buisness forum
>> by player with sushi... unsusified).
>>
>> Also there is no rule 655.
>>
>> However I do not know if there has ever been an object
>> so numbered in the past.
>>
>> If I'm stupid, and the system goes, give it the next
>> number up and we can only use each number once then
>> this CFI is TRUE.
>
>'dunno' hardly counts as a judgment. But you're right. There was an object
>655, because if uin's CFJ was illegal, then I believe the next thing that
>gets recognized, be it proposal, rule, or CFJ, must be 655 instead.
>
>--
>Wonko

"Dunno" sounds like "undecided" to me...:)

						Glotmorf