Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Judgement on C-F-J 6-1-8

[Wonko <dplepage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Glotmorf,

> 
> 
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> 
> On 4/25/02 at 7:35 AM The Voice wrote:
> 
>> I appeal Glotmorf's ruling on C-F-J 6-1-8, on the grounds that nowhere in
>> the ruleset does it say that rules with no given Chutzpah value have a
>> Chutzpah of zero.
>> 
>> -0-Thus Spake The Voice-0-
> 
> Actually, Rule 217 says that new rules that don't have a chutzpah set get a
> chutzpah of 1, but Rule 3 went in before chutzpah was defined, and Rule 217
> doesn't say what chutzpah goes to previously existing rules.  I'd bet on 0,
> since other changable ratings start out that way.  But whether it's 0 or 1,
> Rule 394 has a chutzpah of 2, which means you can still tackle while the clock
> is off.  And therefore, it's not true that no action not specifically stated
> can be taken while the clock is off.
> 
> Glotmorf
> 

Rules before Chutzpah have Chutzpah 0. It was in the prop. that created
Chutzpah - "Assign all rules a Chutzpah of zero."

-- 
Wonko