RE: spoon-business: RE: spoon-discuss: Re: Game Action

["Jonathan Van Matre" <JVanMatre@xxxxxxxx>]

It's not at all clear, especially considering game precedent, whether the forfeiture action was legal or illegal.  Again, Rule 14 specifies how a player *may* forfeit.  It doesn't limit forfeiture to that method, except if one interprets rule 18 in a manner that qualifies what rule 14 does as prohibition of any other method of forfeiture.  That was the point *I* was getting at, though you're right about the game-state-shutdown issue being raised, too.

--Scoff!

> Dude...Rule 14 regulates how a Player forfeits, and it takes 
> precedence over Rule 18.  That means your action wasn't legal 
> in the first place. So the question wasn't really the 
> legality of your action...the question was whether the game 
> state could be sufficiently altered in the short run by an 
> illegal move that it couldn't be quashed by legal means.
> 
> Though I still think the Administrator has a tofuload of 
> unregulated power available...
> 
> 						Glotmorf
> 
> 
> 
>