Doig, Gavin on 18 Dec 2001 13:15:19 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: spoon-b


> I had declared a slight bit of administrative fiat during nweek 1, and I
> believe "No you don't." to fall in that category.
>
The "things you've declared that don't affect the game" category? ;-)

> Though since I'm declaring that to be the case now, someone could
> conceivably use the fact that I'm reiterating the statement NOW as basis
> for a CFJ (since it's no longer nweek 1).
>
You're not covered by the nweek 1 clause anyway, I think (not being a rule
or a player). Although it might be viewed as a CFJ about the rules, I
suppose (is it legal for you to ignore them? ;-)).

uin.


DISCLAIMER: 
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("the intended
recipients(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which is
privileged, proprietary and/or confidential within the meaning of applicable
law. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have
received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding,
printing or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please contact the
sender of this message as soon as possible. 

The views or opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and
may not necessarily be the views held by Azurgroup Limited