Re: spoon-discuss: Political Go suggested revision and comments

Rob Speer on 22 Mar 2001 23:03:32 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Political Go suggested revision and comments

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Political Go suggested revision and comments
From: Rob Speer <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:33:03 -0500
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10103071926200.3044-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; from wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:54:12PM -0500
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10103071926200.3044-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.15i

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:54:12PM -0500, Dan wrote:
> Would there be objections if we make winning a game of Political Go a
> requirement for winning the game of nomic?

I object. I tried to learn to play Go once and I was really bad at it. :P

--
Rob Speer

References:
- spoon-discuss: Political Go suggested revision and comments
  - From: Dan

Prev by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Political Go suggested revision and comments
Next by Date: spoon-discuss: Mediocrity isn't exactly fixed
Previous by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Political Go suggested revision and comments
Next by thread: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: FPF
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread