Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: R213/203 Fix

Joel Uckelman on 2 Mar 2001 17:40:10 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: R213/203 Fix

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: R213/203 Fix
From: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 11:43:15 -0600
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Mar 2001 18:35:15 +0100." <JLEFIEIKCPOKBKEPEKGOKEBACBAA.joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Quoth =?US-ASCII?Q?Jorg_Rathlev?=:
> =20
> > It looks like Joerg meant for P414 to amend R203, not R213. So, I=20
> > offer the=20
> > following Proposal, entitled "R213/203 Fix", to correct that:
> 
> Ooops... yes.
> 
> 
> Joerg

Luckily that didn't obliterate an important Rule. I shudder to think what 
might have happened if it had killed R111, for instance.

-- 
J.

References:
- spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: R213/203 Fix
  - From: Jorg Rathlev

Prev by Date: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: R213/203 Fix
Next by Date: spoon-discuss: ANSI - an expensive sect?
Previous by thread: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: R213/203 Fix
Next by thread: spoon-discuss: ANSI - an expensive sect?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread