Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal limiting jurisdiction of rules:

["Antonio" <zagarna@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 19 Feb 2001, at 16:17, Joel Uckelman wrote:


> Hmm. I'm not sure that's a good idea, namely because what it means for 
> something to be a public forum is that official actions may be taken there. 
> If the site were a public forum, a page could be hidden away there where 
> someone could do things that would be legal actions, but no one else in the 
> game would have any reasonable way of finding out about, until such time as 
> it was convenient to reveal them. Since I'm the only one who presently can 
> edit the web pages, that someone could only be me. I don't really want to 
> have the option of doing that, nor do I think you should give it to me. So, 
> I'm not going to declare the site as a public forum, pending further 
> argument to the contrary. (If you really want me to, keep trying. You need 
> to come up with some  really persuasive reason, though.)
> 
We could do this on a page per page basis, like 

the webpage http://www.nomic.net/~g1/
the webpage http://www.nomic.net/~g1/Rules.Numerical.1.html
the webpage http://www.nomic.net/~g1/Rules.Numerical.3.html
The webpage bla
The webpage foo
...
...

are all public forums
but that would be complicated too i reckon


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com