Re: spoon-discuss: RE: spoon-business: Proposal: For consistancy

[Dan Waldron <wald7330@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> Hmm. I'm not sure I like the idea of the game being an Agent, simply 
> because it doesn't appear to be one by the current definition of Agent. I 
> suppose if you want to redefine the set of things with Agency as the union 
> of {whatever meets the current definition of Agent} and {the Game}. I won't 
> vote for this without a little more explanation--how is it exactly that the 
> Game can take independent action?
> 


The game is an agent because it has ways of getting its component agents
and officers to do things for it.

I guess this would give the game the power to vote, make proposals, etc.
That might be interesting and I can see why you are nervous about it.
Perhaps declaring the game to be an agent might be a bad thing after all.

I will propose some sort of Bank, to own things for us, and perhaps also
do things like pay officer salaries, etc.

Dan