Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme

Wbfu Xbegorva on 14 Nov 2000 03:51:42 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice
From: Wbfu Xbegorva <kortbein@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:53:38 CST
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2000 21:55:56 CST." <20001114035556.953.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Joel Uckelman sprach:
>If you're creating the Office of Supreme Justice, why not refer to the 
>Officer as simply the "Supreme Justice" instead of the longer (and more 
>cumbersome) "Officer of Supreme Justice"?

"Officer of Supreme Justice" DOES sound cooler.

-- 
josh blog: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~kortbein/blog/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice
  - From: Joel Uckelman

References:
- spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice
  - From: Joel Uckelman

Prev by Date: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice
Next by Date: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice
Previous by thread: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice
Next by thread: Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: Proposal: The Officer of Supreme Justice
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread