RE: spoon-discuss: incompatibility in judgements

["Kieron Jarvis" <kieron.jarvis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you for clearing that up. I was wondering how you could say that
(Zaganra's) proposal stopped revisions. I've looked at your proposal and
like it.

XnJester

> I see the source of the confusion.  You commented on a proposal by
> zagarna, which I vigorously defended, thiking you were referring to my
> proposal which would do almost exaclty the same thing, except would not
> allow gratuitous alterations within the voting period.  My proposal was
> submitted a little while ago but has not been recognized yet.
>
> Poulenc
>
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Kieron Jarvis wrote:
>
> > > For this to happen it would have to be possible for revisions to be
> > > submitted after voting.  Under my proposal this is not possible.  The
only
> > > regard in which this proposal system is any more flexible is that it
> > > forces the recognition of all revisions made up to the start of
voting.
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > My proposal would not allow the withdrawing or revising of proposals
after
> > > voting starts unless they were submitted before the start of voting,
in
> > > which case we would all be aware of them.  Without this amendment we
> > > cannot be sure of what we are voting on until the ballot is published,
and
> > > maybe not even then.
> >
> > I can't see where revisions are not possible after voting commences. I
would
> > like to see revisions limited to the period before voting commences, but
I
> > don't see it here. Maybe I'm missing something.
> >
> > XnJester.