Re: spoon-discuss: Re: spoon-business: RFJ 15 (formerly Judgment on RFJ13)

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Quoth Adam Tomjack:
> (Sun, 08 Oct 2000) Thus Spake Joel Uckelman:
> 
> > Yeah, I knew this was going to happen. This is one of the *BAD* things
> > about our judicial system. Now I'm not sure if Benjamin is a Player--is
> > "should not be listed on the Roster" equivalent to "is not a Player"? I
> > don't know. If they are, I need only execute a removal of Benjamin from the
> > Roster within a reasonable time. 
> 
> If you'll note in my original judgement, I gave no Judicial Order.  I 
> explicitly gave an Order in the second post which ordered the Administrator 
> not to remove Benjamin from the Roster.  I see no reason why a Judgement and 
> the corresponding Judicial Order need to be in the same physical (virtual??) 
> message, nor why the Judicial Order needs to logically follow from the 
> Judgement.  ;)
> 
> God 

I'm not sure about the first part, but I think R214 requires that Judicial Orders make sense in light of the Judgment.

-- 
J.

--
Play Nomic!
http://www.nomic.net