Justin Ahmann on Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:52:02 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 103


I answer CFI 103 UNDECIDED.

Argument: We can't tell whether the Plaintiff actually believed this.  Even if we ask him, he might lie.

Codae




________________________________
From: James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 4:40:58 AM
Subject: [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 103


> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 10:12:06 +0000
> From: darkemalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-b] Ambassador Report
> 
> CFI: I believe that this attempted action fails, on the grounds that there is no mechanism for B Nomic Sucking. Am I correct in this belief?
> 
> --- On Sat, 19/12/09, Kenner Gordon <kennercat@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> From: Kenner Gordon <kennercat@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [s-b] Ambassador Report
> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Saturday, 19 December, 2009, 2:59
> 
> I intend, without 523 objections, to cause B Nomic to Suck.


This is CFI 103.

I assign CFI 103 to Judge Codae.                         
_________________________________________________________________
Have more than one Hotmail account? Link them together to easily access both
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394591/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business