Craig Daniel on Mon, 2 Nov 2009 23:04:17 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.


On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:47 PM,  <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The proposals are:
>
>  1996 - No longer interested (Wooble) AI: 3

FOR - II is an unneeded Agoricism.

>  1997 - Some players are more equal than others (C-Walker) AI: 3

FOR - same reason.

>  1998 - We're all Cretans here (0x44) AI: 1

ABSTAIN

>  1999 - Add reports to the MoM report (Walker) AI: 1

ABSTAIN

>  2000 - Wooble is a CreTIN (Marr965) AI: 1

AGAINST - punishing people over their choice of proposal names is not
in the spirit of this game so far, and I do not want to push B culture
in that direction. Punishing them for *other people's* proposal names
is like that, only also colossally stupid.

>  2001 - First-class Cleanup (Walker) AI: 3

FOR - given that there are no non-first-class persons in the game
unless something gets hilariously strange, this is useful cleanup.

>  2002 - Umm... (coppro) AI: 3

AGAINST, though I approve of the pun.

 - teucer
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business