Re: [s-b] [s-d] CFJ 5a assigned to Panel {ais523, BobTHJ, Tiger}

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My apologies, I did not realize that it was officially remanded to me. I
answer CFJ 5 NO, and defer to the appellant's arguments.

On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:14:08 -0600, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:30, Jonatan Kilhamn
> <jonatan.kilhamn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2009/5/26 Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:52, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I assign the appeal of CFJ 5 to the panel consisting of ais523,
>>>> BobTHJ, and Tiger.
>>>>
>>>> 5 (District Inquiry) TRUE
>>>> The page at
>>>>
>
http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=User:Wooble/Proposed_Ruleset&oldid=11379
>>>> contains an accurate rendition of the text of each of the current
>>>> rules.
>>>
>>> I opine REMAND, and request the judge consider the new arguments that
>>> have been presented.
>>>
>> I also opine REMAND.
>>
> 
> ATTN 0x44: The above action caused this case to be remanded to you for
> a new judgment. I apologize as I should have published an official
> CotC notice to this effect as a reminder to everyone.
> 
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business