|
Roger Hicks on Tue, 26 May 2009 10:47:03 -0700 (MST)
|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|
Re: [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44
|
- To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [s-b] [CotC] CFJ 5 assigned to Judge 0x44
- From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:47:00 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o2WezAgFgCRCIxORZ5gjVtpinXzDDwIlNLTuJUUqcEY=; b=tBVqDd29EM2birfVhuVR2V1fZGgwuAZpQnwtvcnJ0kbykxJ/TfqMEq+jCUL+KnGQnF tjpQphW/sbA/v8hBjxRYu4D0sCuYDWHG3L4ChfsRjSv1sA4cQ+xrUjJZ3yxBOpNr/bCI NWjQs55vfq9uTwkeJu15B2W+iv4xoAVpEbw/Q=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pegQ8Qub+C26zxH4x49/sPshDQ3/WOKHyqM2cSQcvDqfbFAE2rcThy0qVy29Fvf4th pafR2iNcReFz04sG90m2XRP0MMYsTpUKtaSTse66chC+5CYFZDco3hZQV2wUdfKXWr6W YYAZufaQYlJRJ0eo7o1gdgIxazsA4whD1pekc=
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0905260914140.16295@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <230FCF13-CC26-41BB-9C78-2153FA58514B@xxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.43.0905260914140.16295@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:14, Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2009, comex wrote:
>> I intend to appeal this with two support. Rule 105 explicitly disallows
>> simultaneous rule changes. If those specified by the proprosal are necessarily
>> simultaneous, they cannot occur at all.
>
> I support. -G.
>
As much as I'd rather sweep this under the rug, I don't think it would
work (thanks to those who pointed that out). I support and initiate
the appeal of this case.
BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business