bnomic on Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:03:58 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Reassignment


I claim J's below Answer to be INCONSISTENT. 

On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:28:19 -0500, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I claim j's below Answer to be INCONSISTENT. We've already gone through
the
> debate, I think ais523's scam worked, and that is why.
> 
> BP
> 
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> Ed Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> Codae wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> I request that the Oracle ZOT this Consultation because there's
> probably
>>>> someone out there who understands the situation better than I do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I assign Consultation 203 to Priest j.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I answer YES, Rule 5e57 still exists.
>>
>> Per the Contract, "ais523 may modify this contract by appending the
>> following text to rule 5e47, then repealing rule 5e57".
>>
>> This is not grant any abilities to modify the ruleset, and should be
> parsed
>> as, "ais523 may modify this contract after successfully becoming a
> dictator
>> through other means."
>>
>>
>> j
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business